Vaccine manufacturers are continually adding new ingredients to their vaccines in a bid to make them more effective. E coli was recently added to the GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Meningitis B vaccine, Bexsero. An ingredient that, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), can cause a range of serious illnesses.1
The CDC stated that:
Escherichia coli (abbreviated as E. coli) are bacteria found in the environment, foods, and intestines of people and animals. E. coli are a large and diverse group of bacteria. Although most strains of E. coli are harmless, others can make you sick. Some kinds of E. coli can cause diarrhea, while others cause urinary tract infections, respiratory illness and pneumonia, and other illnesses.”2
Due to the fact that E. coli can cause serious illness and the fact that many of the illnesses listed by the CDC can, in fact, be found listed as side effects, I decided to investigate exactly which ingredients are being added to our vaccinations and why.
It is worth noting that, while the CDC has listed E. coli as an ingredient of the vaccine, Bexsero, in their literature on vaccine ingredients, the manufacturer, GSK, failed to include it as an ingredient in their information leaflet.3
The reason why GSK decided to leave this particular ingredient out of their information leaflet remains a mystery.
The CDC State that Vaccine Ingredients Are Completely Safe
The CDC are continually informing us that vaccinations are “safe and effective.” And they make no exception when it comes to informing us just how “safe and effective” ingredients that are being used in our vaccinations truly are. They stated that:
Vaccines contain ingredients, called antigens, which cause the body to develop immunity. Vaccines also contain very small amounts of other ingredients. All ingredients either help make the vaccine, or ensure the vaccine is safe and effective …” 4
A similar statement has also been issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on their website. They stated that:
Each ingredient in a vaccine serves a specific purpose. For example, vaccine ingredients may:
Help provide immunity (protection) against a specific disease
Help keep the vaccine safe and long lasting
Be used during the production of the vaccine” 5
Their statement also clearly indicates their claim that all of the ingredients used vaccinations are completely safe. In fact, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) went one step further. They stated that:
The vast majority of the over one billion doses of vaccines manufactured worldwide each year are given to healthy babies, children and adults. Thus, it is critical that vaccines be demonstrated to be safe and effective.
FDA requires that vaccines undergo a rigorous and extensive development program in the laboratory, as well as in animal studies and human clinical trials, to determine their safety and effectiveness. Highly trained FDA scientists and clinicians carefully evaluate all of the information in a marketing application and make a determination whether to license (approve) a vaccine before it can be used in the United States.
Prior to licensure, as part of FDA’s evaluation, FDA takes all of the ingredients of a vaccine into account, including the active ingredients as well as other substances. After FDA approves a vaccine, FDA continuously monitors its safety.” 6
These claims, outlined by three of the world’s leading organizations, would lead us to believe that the ingredients used in vaccinations are safe and effective.
However, just how safe are they?
Are Vaccine Ingredients Really as Safe as We Have Been Led to Believe?
Many parents and professionals are completely unaware of exactly which ingredients are in our vaccines.
In 2012, the late Dr. Harold Buttram wrote an article titled The Ultimate Gamble: Do Childhood Vaccines Result in Genetic Hybridization from Alien Human and Animal DNA Contents?7
As the title suggests, his article contains powerful evidence suggesting that vaccine manufacturers may be intentionally tampering with human DNA, in an effort to develop hybrids. (Hybridization is the mating between unrelated individuals. In plant systems, the term is most commonly used to mean mating between different species.)8
In an effort to explain his theory in more detail, Buttram explained that:
According to an article in World Medicine, 1971, scientists at the University of Geneva made the startling discovery that biological substances entering directly into the blood stream may truly become a part of us and even a part of our genetic material. The article stated in part:
“When Japanese bacteriologists discovered that bacteria of one species transferred their own highly specific antibiotic resistance to bacteria of an entirely different species, they seemed to hit on a unique if not startling phenomenon. Dr. Maurice Stroun and Dr. Philippe Anker, with colleagues in the Department of Plant Physiology at the University of Geneva, have now accumulated a wealth of evidence that the transfer of genetic information is not confined to bacteria but also can occur between bacteria and higher plants and animals.”
The Geneva scientists are convinced that normal animal and plant cells also shed DNA and that this DNA is also taken up by other cells in the organism. If they are right, the consequences to virtually every aspect of a cell’s metabolism would be considerable. The growth and development, diseases, and even the evolution of an organism would be affected.”
He stated that:
As purely genetic material, it would be expected that viruses are more prone to the process of “jumping genes” than other microorganisms. The following publication tends to support this hypothesis: In a study of 24 passages of a nuclear polyhedrosis virus through cell cultures, there were both insertions and deletions in the virus, appearing to suggest that the virus both donated genetic material to and received genetic material from the cells in which it was cultured, therefore suggesting that similar viral exchanges take place in the human system.”
Buttram supported his theory, that the vaccine manufacturers could be deliberately contaminating childhood vaccinations with foreign DNA, in a bid to interfere with our human DNA, by compiling a list of vaccine ingredients.
Underneath his list of vaccine ingredients, he wrote the following information:
Aluminum, a neurotoxin, is associated with Alzheimer’s disease and seizures.
Formaldehyde is a known cancer-causing agent commonly used to embalm corpses.
Glycerin, a tri-atomic alcohol extracted from natural fats which are putrified [sic] and decomposed, has known toxic effects including kidney, liver, and lung damage, dieresis, pronounced local tissue damage, gastrointestinal damage, death.
Phenol (carbolic acid is a deadly poison, a common disinfectant and dye.)
Phenyethanol [sic] is known to depress the central nervous system and may cause vomiting and diarrhea. (FDA)
Thimerosal (a mercury derivative) is a toxic heavy metal that is not easily eliminated from the body. Metal toxicity can result in brain injury and autoimmune disease.
Oil adjuvants are known to cause hypersensitivity reactions, cysts, and adjuvant arthritis.”
He concluded that:
Of all the benefits provided by God and nature for the human species, human genetics must be considered the greatest and most indispensable. Are we a nation of people incapable of recognizing imminent danger signs in the health, welfare, and genetics of our children, and in recognizing these dangers to take corrective actions in their behalf? I think we are capable of taking such actions, but time may be running out. At some unknown future time this process will reach a point-of-no-return in terms of vaccine-induced genetic hybridization that will become incompatible with human reproduction. Mass extinctions are already taking place in plant and animal species, largely due to human encroachments and interventions. Are we soon to follow suit?”
To many people, Buttram’s theory may appear to be extremely unlikely; however, there is mounting evidence to suggest that he may have been spot-on.
Why is Animal and Human DNA Being Added to Our Vaccinations?
According to Buttram and the CDC’s list of vaccine ingredients, many childhood vaccines include the following substances:
- Animal tissues: pig blood, horse blood, rabbit brain,
- African Green Monkey kidney (Vero) cell (CDC list of ingredients)
- Dog kidney, monkey kidney,
- Chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg
- Calf (bovine) serum
- Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (CDC list of ingredients)
- Fetal bovine serum
- Human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)
- Porcine (pig) pancreas
- VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells
- Washed sheep red blood cells
The question is, why?
The CDC does not appear to address the inclusion of animal and human DNA in childhood vaccinations anywhere in their information on vaccination ingredients. They stated that:
Chemicals commonly used in the production of vaccines include a suspending fluid (sterile water, saline, or fluids containing protein); preservatives and stabilizers (for example, albumin, phenols, and glycine); and adjuvants or enhancers that help improve the vaccine’s effectiveness. Vaccines also may contain very small amounts of the culture material used to grow the virus or bacteria used in the vaccine, such as chicken egg protein.”9
As you can see, other than outlining the use of chicken egg protein, the CDC appeared to offer no real explanation as to why the DNA from animals and humans should be used in the manufacturing of childhood vaccinations.
However, the website The History of Vaccines did. They stated that:
Animals have been used in the industrialized production of human vaccines since vaccine farms were established to harvest cowpox virus from calves in the late 1800s. From that point, and through the first half of the 20th century, most vaccines would continue to be developed with the use of animals, either by growing pathogens in live animals or by using animal cells.”10
They explained that the use of animal products to develop vaccinations does have its limitations. They stated that:
Although many vaccines and anti-toxin products were successfully developed this way, using animals in vaccine development – particularly live animals – is not ideal. Research animals are costly and require extensive monitoring, both to maintain their health and to ensure the continued viability of the research. They may be carrying other bacteria or viruses that could contaminate the eventual vaccine, as with polio vaccines from the mid-20th century that were made with monkey cells and eventually found to contain a monkey virus called SV40, or Simian Virus 40. (Fortunately, the virus was not found to be harmful to humans.) Moreover, some pathogens, such as the chickenpox virus, simply do not grow well in animal cells.”
They continued that:
Even when vaccine development is done using animal products and not live animals – such as growing influenza vaccine viruses in chicken eggs – development can be hindered or even halted if the availability of the animal products drops. If an illness were to strike the egg-producing chickens, for example, they might produce too few eggs to be used in the development of seasonal flu vaccine, leading to a serious vaccine shortage.”
Sadly, there was no mention of ethics regarding the use of animal DNA in the development of vaccinations. However, the website did cover the ethical issues of the use of human DNA in vaccinations. They stated that:
Groups that object to abortion have raised ethical questions about Plotkin’s rubella vaccine (and other vaccines developed with similar human cell strains) over the years.”
Because of its position on abortion, some members of the Catholic Church asked for its moral guidance on the use of vaccines developed using cell strains started with human fetal cells. This includes the vaccine against rubella as well as those against chickenpox and hepatitis A, and some other vaccines. The official position according to the National Catholic Bioethics Center is that individuals should, when possible, use vaccines not developed with the use of these human cell strains.”
While it appears that the vaccine manufacturers do not have any ethical or moral concerns using foreign DNA in their vaccines, other organizations do.
One Church Made Their Feelings on the Subject Abundantly Clear
In a letter addressed to President Nelson, President Oaks, and President Eyring in 2019, author Brett Wilcox, a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints wrote:
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is well known for its emphasis on protecting the sanctity of the family. The Church is also known for its support of vaccination programs, as evidenced by public statements encouraging vaccination, vaccine requirements for prospective missionaries, and its participation in and funding of international vaccination initiatives.
By linking arms with the vaccine industry, the Church has literally linked arms with the arm of flesh. Nearly all modern vaccines are contaminated with DNA fragments from various animals and from aborted male and female foetuses.” 11
It seems highly unlikely that a loving God would intend to have fetuses harvested, processed, and injected back into the bodies of pregnant women, infants, toddlers, and children. And surely, God did not intend to have His children place their faith in a one-size-fits-all medical intervention based on a (secret) combination of human sacrifice and cannibalism.”
These are strong words from Wilcox, however, he did not stop there. He wrote:
Contrary to commonly accepted dogma, vaccines are dangerous. Vaccine researchers—fully aware of this fact—design “safety” studies to hide vaccine injury and death. Rather than compare new vaccines to an inert placebo, researchers compare them to another vaccine, vaccines, or toxic vaccine ingredients, such as aluminum, which scientists routinely use to induce autoimmunity in laboratory rats. The result of these experiments is known beforehand: at least 2% of vaccine recipients in both the test group and the “placebo” group will experience serious adverse events. Researchers write off the injuries as “New Medical Events” unrelated to the test vaccine or to the toxic “placebo.” I repeat for emphasis: Researchers intentionally injure, and sometimes kill, healthy children who would not have been injured or killed, had they been given a legitimate placebo. The FDA licenses new vaccines fully aware that industry “safety” tests are nothing more than scientific treachery.”
Amazingly, Wilcox’s next paragraph contained similar connotations to those used by Dr. Buttram, because he stated that:
The ritual of vaccination is an assault on decency, individual health, families, and on the human race. The DNA in vaccines of both fetal and animal origin has the capacity to insert itself into the DNA of vaccine recipients. Vaccines currently in development will intentionally and permanently alter human DNA and the human genome. Consequently, we may be among the last of our species who are fully male, female, or even human.”
If he is correct, then surely this is something that should be questioned further by our governments.
UK Nurse Refuses to Vaccinate her Patients with Gardasil
One sexual health nurse, working in the UK, who wishes to stay anonymous, has told me that she is extremely concerned about the number of ingredients that are being included in our vaccinations and their potential side effects.
In a shock interview, she told me that she has become so concerned about the vaccination Gardasil that she is now refusing to vaccinate her patients with the vaccine.
She told me that, over the years, she has become concerned about the number of adverse reactions that were being reported. She stated that:
In our clinic, we are being encouraged to offer patients, the hepatitis A vaccine, the hepatitis B vaccine and the HPV vaccine, all at the same time. After reading the list of ingredients that each of these vaccines contained, in the information leaflets, I became concerned about the potential effects that these ingredients could have on my patients.”
She told me that when she mentioned her concerns to her managers, they told her that the vaccine had been authorized by the local health authority, and therefore it must be safe.
She said that she was told to continue to give the vaccination to her patients, until she was told otherwise.
However, due to her concerns, she told me that she no longer gives the vaccination and is currently looking for alternative employment.
A Toxic Substance Used in Roundup Can also be Found in Vaccines
Glyphosate is another toxic substance that has been found in vaccinations. According to the National Pesticide Information Centre:
Glyphosate is an herbicide. It is applied to the leaves of plants to kill both broadleaf plants and grasses. The sodium salt form of glyphosate is used to regulate plant growth and ripen specific crops.
Glyphosate was first registered for use in the U.S. in 1974. Glyphosate is one of the most widely used herbicides in the United States. People apply it in agriculture and forestry, on lawns and gardens, and for weeds in industrial areas. Some products containing glyphosate control aquatic plants.”12
Given the fact that glyphosate is highly toxic and is commonly used in weed killers such as Roundup, it is difficult to understand why it has been found in childhood vaccines.
To find out more, I asked, senior research scientist and expert on glyphosate, Dr. Stephanie Seneff, to explain to me why glyphosate has been found in vaccines.
She explained that although glyphosate can often be found in vaccinations, it is an accidental contaminant. In other words, it has not been added to the vaccines intentionally by the pharmaceutical companies. Confused, I asked her to explain how vaccinations can become contaminated with such a dangerous substance. She told me that:
It is pretty consistently the live virus vaccines that are showing up with glyphosate contamination, in the range of 1 to 4 ppb. This is hypothesized to be due to the fact that the live virus is typically cultured on cells from chick embryos, and nutrients that are supplied include gelatin and fetal bovine serum, both of which are likely to be contaminated. Gelatin is derived from the bones and ligaments of pigs and cows fed heavy doses of glyphosate in their feed. Monsanto studies have shown that glyphosate accumulates in the bones.”
Given this information, I asked Dr. Seneff, what vaccinations included glyphosate as a CONTAMINANT? She told me that the:
Contaminated vaccines include MMR, varicella, flu vaccine and shingles vaccine, with the highest levels found in MMR.”
Shocked by her response, I asked her what the known dangers of glyphosate were. She responded that:
Glyphosate is linked to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in exposed agricultural workers. It is known to cause liver damage and kidney damage in rats exposed to small chronic doses. It has been shown to disturb neurodevelopment in amphibians. It has been proposed as a major causal factor in chronic kidney disease of unknown origin (CKDu) affecting sugarcane workers in Central America. It has been shown to act as an antibiotic and preferentially kills beneficial bacteria such as bifidobacteria and Lactobacillus in the gut microbiome. Its usage on core crops has increased dramatically in step with the dramatic rise in autism in the U.S., as well as many other diseases.”
I asked if there were any other products that were contaminated with glyphosate and she stated that:
It is a contaminant in many different products including major foods such as oats, wheat, barley, chickpeas, garbanzo beans, soy, corn, etc. It has been found in tampons and disposable baby diapers. (Cotton is a GMO Roundup-Ready crop.)”
I found Seneff’s information to be extremely worrying, especially in the wake of so many vaccine mandates. If we continue to accept vaccination mandates in the future, then this acceptance potentially gives the green light for the pharmaceutical industry to add any ingredients they want, to our vaccinations.
Once vaccinations are made mandatory by law, we will have absolutely no say in what is and isn’t added to our vaccinations in the future. This could have devastating consequences on our children’s health.