TTAV is experiencing heavy censorship on many social media channels since we’ve been targeted by the mainstream media sellouts, social media bullies, and political turncoats. Be sure to get the TRUTH by subscribing to our email list. It’s free.
A new preprint study in medRxiv is making waves after the researchers found that the risk of myocarditis caused by the COVID vaccine is much higher in teenage boys than previously thought. In fact, the study concluded that the risk of hospitalization for cardiac adverse events following vaccination is higher than the risk of being hospitalized with COVID for healthy teenage boys.
Analysis of medical data suggests that boys aged 12 to 15, with no underlying medical conditions, are four to six times more likely to be diagnosed with vaccine-related myocarditis than ending up in hospital with Covid over a four-month period.
Most children who experienced the rare side-effect had symptoms within days of the second shot of Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, though a similar side-effect is seen with the Moderna jab. About 86% of the boys affected required some hospital care, the authors said.
The report by Tracy Høeg, MD, PhD, of the University of California Davis, and colleagues found that rates of “cardiac adverse events” after the second dose were higher than previous CDC estimates, at 162 per million among boys ages 12 – 15 and 94 per million among boys ages 16 – 17.
At current US infection rates, the risk of a healthy adolescent being taken to hospital with Covid in the next 120 days is about 44 per million, they said. This means that healthy boys are between 214% and 369% MORE LIKELY to be hospitalized because of the vaccine than from the virus.
The study relied heavily on data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, or VAERS. As of September 10th, there were 14,925 reported deaths associated with the COVID vaccines (63% of all vaccine-related deaths reported since 1990). There were 60,741 hospitalizations associated with the COVID jab (44% of all vaccine-related hospitalizations since 1990). There were 701,559 adverse events associated with the COVID shot (46% of all vaccine-related adverse events since 1990).
The study has caused an uproar on social media, with many physicians, politicians, and pundits citing the VAERS data as unreliable source due to its limitations. And they’re right… sort of.
The Lazarus Report estimates that only 1% of vaccine-related adverse events are reported.
This means that the actual number of hospitalizations and deaths related to the vaccines may be closer to 6 million and 1.5 million, respectively. But the study has not slowed efforts to vaccinate children as young as 5 years old.
On Monday, Pfizer announced that it’s new lower dose COVID vaccine was “safe and effective” for children ages 5 – 11, a demographic that has not been eligible for the vaccine (or associated mandates) so far.
But that might soon change.
“These trial results provide a strong foundation for seeking authorization of our vaccine for children 5 to 11 years old, and we plan to submit them to the FDA and other regulators with urgency,” said Albert Bourla, the chairman and CEO for Pfizer.
The long-term health effects of the mRNA vaccines on teenage boys (or any demographic, for that matter) are unknown. VAERS is limited because it relies on voluntary reporting. It was designed as a sort of early warning system to track potential problems with vaccines.
By any metric, the significant increase in reported events associated with the COVID shots is alarming. Remember, there have been more reported deaths associated with the COVID shots over the past 9 months than from all other vaccines combined over the last 30 years!
Some so-called “experts” have complained that Høeg et al. misinterpreted the data and should trust the CDC’s own research, which shows a much lower incidence of heart problems associated with the jab.
Høeg said the group used the same definition of myocarditis that the CDC did for its previous estimates using VAERS data, and that cardiologist and co-author John Mandrola, MD was key in vetting reports. She also pointed to the established fact that VAERS often provides an underestimate of the true prevalence of an adverse event.
Several physicians, however, have asked why this group would bother repeating the CDC’s own analysis, especially if they are using the same definition of myocarditis — and working without CDC’s adjudicated data.
“We repeated the project because we were concerned about the symptom search criteria the CDC used being too narrow,” Høeg told reporters. “We found around 40% of our cases simply using expanded symptom search criteria from theirs but requiring the same objective evidence they did of myocarditis (which we called in our paper ‘cardiac adverse event’).”
She said they also wanted to stratify risk by age groups 12-15 and 16-17, which CDC hadn’t done:
“As a mom of 10- and 13-year-old boys, this was important information for me to see and I know many other parents feel the same way. The benefit of using the VAERS first was this is a rare event, which we were just beginning to track in the U.S., and VAERS gave us quick access to the largest number of reported cases,” Høeg said. “We could also easily identify instances of post-vaccination cardiac injury in terms of troponin levels, along with case descriptions (which we have made publicly available) and directly compare our rates with those that the CDC found, demonstrating that there may be a significant amount of missed post-vaccination cardiac damage in this age group, specifically in the youngest group, compared to what the CDC had initially reported.”
Unfortunately, this kind of bad science is par for the course when it comes to the CDC. And if you’re wondering why the CDC would be motivated to spin the narrative, you don’t need to look much further than their bank accounts.
Members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), who actually decide which vaccines are recommended to be added to the CDC vaccine schedules, are often financially involved with vaccine manufacturers.
ACIP members may own stock in Big Pharma companies that are responsible for producing the vaccines that the ACIP committee recommends! In fact, the law firm Weltchek Mallahan & Weltchek found over 50 patents connected to vaccines owned or shared by one or more members of ACIP or other committees within the CDC.
Willingly placing children in harm’s way is arguably the most despicable sin of all. The available data tells us that these “vaccines” are putting our kids in even more danger than the disease it’s supposed to treat.
With billions in annual vaccine revenue, it seems our children are just another way for Pfizer’s cronies to make money… no matter the cost.